Short Stories v. Novels: Fight!

There’s a school of thought that says you should begin with writing short stories and work your way up to novels; that the short form will provide you with the background and skill set you need to plot and characterize your way through the long.

I tend to think that’s like saying you should start by eating apples and work your way up to oranges. They’re entirely different, er, fruits (I was going to say animals, but, well), and I’ve never thought being good at one means you’ll be good at the other.

Me, I’m good at novels. I’m good at ideas that keep right on trucking along and develop over hundreds of pages, not tens or even fewer. Short stories are much harder for me, both to read and to write. The single thrust of a short story has to be damned clever, or profound, or witty, for it to work really well, and I think that’s flat-out hard to do. I admire people who can do it consistently and well.

I have written three short stories in the last few days, and hope to write another couple by the end of the week, in plans of doing a short fiction post week over at my main journal, mizkit.com.

Clearly I have lost my mind.

I’m sure this is good practice for something. I’m not sure what; for an eventual anthology of my own stories, maybe. Or for being invited to participate in anthologies. I’m certainly unlikely to get rich whipping out 2500 word stories and selling them, since venues for shorts often can’t pay a lot.

I think the crux of it is that it’s a challenge. It’s something I’m not especially good at, and I’d like to be a dab hand at most aspects of my chosen career, so I need to practice. I’ve spent many, many years practicing writing long stories. A week here or there practicing writing short ones probably isn’t going to get me up to the same speed, but at least it’s a chance of improvement.

So what are you working on that’s not your natural strength?

About My Editor

People often compare the relationship between an agent and a writer to a marriage.  And in many ways, it’s an apt analogy.  Writers and agents choose each other, and usually it’s a choice that’s made as a long-term commitment.  Writers may go from publisher to publisher and from editor to editor, but we try to stick with the same agent for as long as possible.  With an agent, you look to establish long-term career goals and strategies for attaining them.  It is a relationship built for the long haul.  Sometimes it doesn’t work out, and the break-ups can be difficult, even bitter.

The editor-author relationship, on the other hand, is more complicated and harder to define.  At times the relationship is formed more as a matter of convenience than by choice.  Most writers end up with an editor based upon which publishing house buys that author’s books.  (Sometimes an agent approaches a particular editor with the idea that the book is a good fit for his or her taste.  In my case, my manuscript was simply assigned to the person who would become my editor at Tor.)  The editor-author relationship on an artistic level is, at its best, very much a partnership.  But that partnership is complicated by the fact that on a business level there is some built-in tension.  Authors want to make as much money as possible; editors are expected to contract books with the best possible terms for the publishing house.  In fact, one of the primary responsibilities of an agent is to take on the business battles on the author’s behalf, so as to maintain the viability of the artistic partnership between author and editor.

 So, while agents and authors have marriages, editors and authors have relationships of all different sorts.  Mine is most like the rapport between older and younger brothers.  Let me begin by saying that I like my editor very much.  His name is James Frenkel, and he’s been at Tor for a long time now.  We forgive each other for our personality quirks, and we have times when we’re at loggerheads.  But overall we get along very well.  I should also say that I’ve been very fortunate, and a bit unusual, in that I’ve written all ten of my novels (including THE HORSEMEN’S GAMBIT, which comes out in January) for one publishing house and one editor.

I entered the business knowing nothing about the business side of writing, and having never written a novel-length work of fiction.  I was as green as I could be.  And so I was fortunate that my manuscript ended up on the desk of someone who had been in the business for decades, who had worked as a publisher, an agent, and an editor, and who was married to a writer.  He knew the business from every perspective.

From the beginning, then, Jim served not only as my editor, but also as my mentor.  He explained the business to me.  When I traveled to New York to see him or met him at conventions, he introduced around.  He knows EVERYONE in the SF/Fantasy field, and he was more than happy to help me make connections.  When he went through that first book of mine, he tore it apart, pointing out all the places where I had made mistakes.  And I’d made a lot of them.

Some of my errors were technical.  I was a good writer mechanically, but I had been trained in academia.  Novel writing demanded different skills, and followed different rules.  Jim helped me learn them.  He pointed out places where my narrative dragged and suggested ways to punch it up.  Perhaps most important, he showed me where I had betrayed my characters, having them do or say things that weren’t true to who and what they were.

In short, he had the rare ability to address both micro and macro issues.  He could do line editing (wording, syntax, the little stuff) as well as big picture editing (character, plotting, worldbuilding).  That first book was almost like an apprenticeship.  I learned so much from him, and wound up with a novel that was far, far better than it had been when I first wrote it.

The second book was easier; the third easier than that.  I’ve improved with every book I’ve written.  Much of my early learning was a direct result of Jim’s revision notes.  Later in my career I began to pick stuff up for myself, and over the years I’ve developed a style that is very much my own.  And as this has happened, Jim has worked on my manuscripts with a lighter hand.  Every once in a while, if I start developing bad habits or I fall back into old mistakes, he kicks me around a little.  But in general I need less, and so he does less.

This is where that older brother-younger brother thing comes in.  I have three older siblings, and they’re all a good deal older than I am. (Fourteen, twelve, and six years older to be precise.)  So this is a relationship dynamic I understand pretty well.  When I was starting out I needed guidance — I needed to be taught.  Today, I still need critiquing.  No manuscript is ever perfect, and Jim still has an uncany ability to understand what I’m trying to do with my worlds, my characters, my stories.  But I don’t need nearly as much direction as I used to.  And he’s been able to make that adjustment.  Just as my relationships with my siblings have changed as I’ve joined them in adulthood, my rapport with Jim has grown as my writing has developed.  We’re still good friends.  We still argue.  But for the most part, we deal with each other as equals now. 

Not all editors and writers have this kind of rapport.  This is not to say that they don’t have relationships that work every bit as well as the one I have with Jim.  But all editor-writer relationships are different.  This was intended to be a snapshot of mine. 

The book I’m writing now, the third and final volume of Blood of the Southlands, is the last book I have under contract with Tor.  This could be the last book I do with my current editor.  That’s a strange thought — a bit frightening, but also a bit exciting.  I could easily end up selling my next project to Tor and remaining exactly where I am.  Or I could move on.  Either way, I’ll carry with me all that I’ve learned from Jim thus far.

binge reading

That’s my excuse for continuing to forget to post on Tuesdays: I’ve been reading.

One of the things they don’t tell you about becoming a professional writer is that it really cuts into your time to read. Every writer I know whimpers about this. I know one who got herself a part-time job reviewing books so she could read and not feel guilty about not working. That’s how bad it gets.

For me, I have a very difficult time getting involved in a book someone else wrote when I’m working on one of my own. The further out of genre I go, the easier it is, and re-reads are manageable, but essentially, when I find myself at the To Be Read shelves, what I end up thinking is, “…I’d rather be writing.” And I’ve been doing that for four years now. I take breaks between books, and read a bunch during those breaks, but they’re usually fairly short breaks and it often takes me a couple of weeks just to get out of Writer Head.

Slightly over a year ago my husband and I declared a moratorium on buying new books until we’d gotten the TBR shelves down to a single shelf. I just checked, and I’ve read 108 books since then. 17 of those were re-reads (and 12 of those 17 were graphic novels, which is almost cheating). Either way, they go under “stuff we already owned” or “stuff I wrote and was editing/revising”. Fifteen or so were new purchases despite the moratorium (though really, that’s pretty good, wouldn’t you say?), so I had around 80 books on the TBR shelf a year ago. I’m down to 7 now, and I read 33 of them in the last 8 weeks.

This is my entire excuse for failing to blog. :) I must say, though, it’s been *wonderful* to read so much. It’s like writing, only somebody else tells the story! And boy, I’ve missed it.

“Honey, Could You Help Me With Something?”

I was the guest of a book club earlier this week.  They were very excited to meet “a real author”, so for the first little while, the conversation was all about how amazing it was that I’d written a whole book, and what a good story it was.  Which is lovely, of course - everyone likes a little positive attention now and then.  Eventually the topic turned to the book itself.  Except for one, the ladies of the club weren’t fantasy readers, so Mad Kestrel was unknown territory for them.  To my relief, they all said they’d enjoyed the story, and started asking the usual questions - how long did it take, how much did it cost to publish (ha ha!), and so on.

We eventually got to the subject of research.  When I was working on the story, I read a great deal, and visited historic sites, even went on a couple of Pirate Walks in Charleston, SC.  I spent time with pirate reenactors, to hear how they talked and what they talked about.  I listened to shanties while I worked.  I wasn’t trying to make my book historically accurate, just trying to capture a flavor.  But that wasn’t the only kind of research I did.  I also used my husband and son to help me visualize action scenes.  For a while, fights were difficult for me to write, because I’d reach the climax of the conflict and realize, Hey, his elbow can’t be bending that way! or She’d need three legs to kick him like that.  So I’d ask my husband and my son to slowly block out the scene as I read it.  I could see where the blows were landing (or not) and what I needed to change.  Just last week I acted out a scene myself with him, because I needed to know how much freedom of movement Kestrel might have if her arm was pulled up behind her back.  I’m a visual learner, so this method works for me like nothing else can.

One day during the writing of Mad Kestrel, I was absolutely failing to make sense of a scene.  Kestrel was running from soldiers, had an injured shoulder, and needed to jump down from a low roof (with a sword at her side) to make good her escape.  Having suffered plenty of ankle injuries in my time, I knew she shouldn’t jump straight-legged.  But for the life of me I couldn’t imagine how it would look if she leaped and rolled.  Once again, here came the husband to help.  He strapped one of our replica swords on his belt, climbed onto the roof of my Chevy Blazer, and leaped off four or five times, hitting the ground rolling.  We learned that it would be better to let Kestrel drop the sword down first, but tucking into a roll position that protected the bad shoulder was easily accomplished.  And once he’d let me see how it looked, I could write it.

So what crazy things have you done (or thought about doing, or strong-armed your family into doing for you) in order to rev up what you’re writing?

Starting Over…?

I thought I’d write about the realities of the publishing business today – and not the good stuff.  Yeah, I’m cranky.  For good reason.  I have a mystery-writing friend—someone I worked with a long while and introduced to her agent and celebrated with her through her first books.  She just called…

 

She just found out that her numbers on the first two books were not high enough and the publishing company is not picking her up after book three (which isn’t even released yet).  They will not be buying more books from her, under that name, with that character, ever.  Her career is dead in the water.  Which just gripes my goat.  Or would if I had one.

 

Apparently this happened last week and it just hit her.  Hard.  She just emailed me and I … well, I am still shocked.  I had hoped she would make it.  Really hoped she would, because she has become a good friend and is a kind, good, person, and her writing makes me laugh.  What more can you ask?

 

Now she has to make some tough decisions.  Does she stop writing?  Write something else?  If so, what?  Under another name?  With another agent?  Is she stopping and quitting or starting over?  What more can her heart-of-a-writer take?  These are the decisions that plague writers whose books do not earn enough to make them viable to their publishing company.  It is worse than being orphaned (losing one’s editor to attrition, downsizing, pregnancy, new better job, whatever.)

 

How it works: Most publishing houses offer a three book deal (average) to an unknown writer, though there are exceptions (waves to Misty,).  They then give that writer two books to make a name, build a fan base, sell through, and earn royalties on the third book of the three book deal.  Some few houses will go more books.  Up to five.  After that it is sayonara, baby.  It hurts.

 

My first two books (two book deal) with a co-writer, sold under the name Gary Hunter, and was planned to be a six book series (per the editor who so enthusiastically purchased the first two books) about an undercover cop in Washington, DC.  Then Rodney King happened.  Cop books disappeared from the market almost overnight.  Only Joseph Wambaugh survived the ensuing list purge, and he reportedly took a *huge* cut in his advances for the next few books.  Gary Hunter was purged.  My writing partner gave up.  And I had to decide who I was, what I was going to write, and if my creative heart could do this again.

 

I took a year off to decide and experiment with fiction and voice and character, and sent in four or five proposals to my agent.  Each proposal consisted of a five to ten page single-spaced outline and at least thirty manuscript pages.  I had huge publisher interest in a *lady cop* book but could never find the voice.  I also couldn’t find a voice for fantasy.  And my agent, who was less than excited about my career at that point, did not represent fantasy.

 

After a year of grieving, I reinvented myself as a mystery writer.  It hasn’t been an easy ride – more like taking a river at flood stage, over a cofferdam, in a leaky kayak.  I have survived.  So far.  But my friend’s pain is my pain.  What will tomorrow bring?  It is dang scary.  At times like this I really hate this business.  Almost as much as I love it.

 

So.  I guess my question is this.  If you got canned and had to start over, (either at the beginning of your career, for our not-yet-published fans/writers, or now, at whatever point you are at, career-wise, for my co-bloggers and other commercially published writers) how would you handle it?  What would you do?  Would you give up?  Pick a new name?  Start drinking?  *smiles*  What?

Faith

A Labor Day Post

Okay, my turn to forget….  The national holiday thing threw me.  That and the fact that, once again, I have no idea what to write.  I’m getting blogged-out, I think.

I’m in the final stages of writing my work in progress.  I have the last chapters outlined and know exactly where the book is going and how I’m going to get there.  What’s more, I like the ending and the build-up to it.  The last chapter — which may end up being an epilogue — is a little self-indulgent, though I think fans of my earlier work will like it a lot.  Point is though, the hardest part of the book is past me.  The rest should be easy.

But it’s not turning out that way.  Remember all those distractions I wrote about last week?  Well, they’re calling my name.  You know all those political posts on my personal blogsite last week?  Well, they’re indicative of where my mind’s been recently.  I am thinking about pretty much anything but work right now.    I wrote thirty pages or so last week, which is terrible by Catie’s standards but a pretty good week for me.  Still, those pages were a struggle, and I’m already off to a bad start this week.

Yuck.  I’m kvetching.  (Yiddish for whining.)  I’m having myself a little whinge, as my Aussie friends would put it. 

Ten things I’d rather do than work right now:

1)  Go out and take pictures.  Or work on the pictures I brought back from out West, which are still not entirely processed.

2)  Pull out my guitar and learn something new.  Or play the same old stuff I usually play.

3)  Watch old episodes of “Buffy” or “The West Wing”.  I could do it.  I have the complete DVD collections of both.  I can hear them both calling to me as I type this…

4)  Read one of the half dozen or so books sitting on my shelf waiting to be read.  There are books there by my fellow MagicalWords bloggers, one by Guy Kay, others by Jay Lake and Tobias Buckell and S.L. Farrell.  Those books could keep me busy for a few weeks.

5)  Work on my next project, which currently looks much more interesting and fun and tempting than my current WIP.

6)  Go to the Apple web site and shop for that new desktop computer I’ve promised myself.  Of course the deal is I don’t get it until I finish this book.  But I can browse the website, right?

7)  There is a ton of chocolate in the house.  And there are several bottles of very good Australian Shiraz.  ‘Nough said….

8)  [Laughs]  Okay this one would be good if Nancy was home and both my daughters were at school.  But currently things stand the other way around, and I’m not going to say more….

9)  It’s not too hot out, and there’s a breeze blowing.  It would be a good day to grab my binoculars and go for a hike.

10)  Two words:  computer games.

So, there’s my list.  What does yours look like?  Come on, give it a try.  It’s Labor Day.  What better time to come up with the things you’d like to be doing other than labor?

How Did It Turn Into Friday So Fast?

I promise, I meant to post yesterday. But then I blinked and yesterday turned into today and I’m still not sure how that happened. *sigh*

Have you ever been talking to someone about the book he’s writing and heard something like this?

“Okay, so there’s this goatherd, and he’s out in the pasture one day when he finds a sparkly green rock. When he shines the rock on his shirt, a white-bearded magician appears and tells him he’s the reincarnation of the greatest warrior the land ever had.  He’s a born swordsman!  He has magical powers! And he has to accompany the magician on a quest to find an object of power that can save the kingdom from the evil Flogmuddles who are threatening to take over.”

The peasant-boy-with-a-mighty-destiny is a fantasy trope, a common theme that’s become a cliche. As writers, we do our best to avoid tropes, to create a story that’s fresh and different.  There are a few writers who’ve made a career out of writing tropes in a funny way (Diana Wynn Jones is a master!), but most of the time, they feel like the same-old-same-old.  I was talking to Faith the other day, and I mentioned that a book had disappointed me because it used my least favorite trope, the Magic Baby.

You know the Magic Baby, don’t you? It’s when the heroine or main female love interest suddenly turns up pregnant (usually at a very inconvenient time, say while the world is ending or there’s a battle being waged) but instead of the usual span of several months, she gestates in a couple of weeks, giving birth to a child with “eyes as old as time” or something equally hokey. The Magic Baby is talking intelligently at three hours, walking at one day, grows up within a week, and either becomes an evil, omnipotent monster or else saves the world, dying tragically in the attempt. It’s been a common trope in fantasy literature, movies and television for a long time now, and it’s pretty much a deal-breaker for me. It weakens the female heroine, since she can’t very well battle her own body. Then there’s that  mother instinct that forces the heroine to defend the baby even while it’s melting the countryside with its laser vision.  I adore my offspring, but if he started consuming the neighbors’ life forces I’d march that young’un out behind the woodshed and put a stop to that nonsense. I’ve stopped reading books that are otherwise excellent once the Magic Baby came into play. It just doesn’t make any sense in my world.

So tell me…what literary trope pushes your buttons?

masochist, OC editors, rewrites, and days off

I can’t believe I’m about to say it, but – I have all the deadly, short term deadlines met.  All of them. How about that!

 

And, I actually have something to post about today – a comment that came from my yahoo site about the compassion of editors, or lack thereof. It was very tongue in cheek and started by my observation that a certain developmental editor (book doctor) was very OC.  One of the members asked what that what meant, another member said it (hopefully) meant overly compassionate.

 

For the purpose of this blog:

OC – obsessive compulsive, a very good trait in an editor.

AR – anal retentive, a difficult trait in an editor as they can be pretty hard to satisfy. Yes you can make up your own jokes from these. I won’t help you, however. <grins>

 

Compassion? Not a good trait. Not at all. The last thing I want in an editor is someone who is afraid to hurt my feelings. I want someone who believes in me, in my work, and in my future, and is willing to push me to my limits without remorse. I *want* my editor to be rough and tough and mean and gruff. (Isn’t there a childhood rhyme about that?) I want her to point out my failings and the failings in my story. I want her free to be (and do) all that. Okay – she can feel sorry that she hurt me, and pity my whimpers, but she must not be afraid to rip me a new one with every manuscript.

 

Why? If I screw up, the readers will either hate me, abandon me, or laugh at me, and not buy the book and will post bad reviews. I’d rather my editor be ruthless than the readers. I’d rather she be totally OC.

 

That is one reason (the biggest one) that my muse is so oddball and ugly. That is the reason why he carries a whip and isn’t afraid to use it. That is also the reason why I sometimes sit down and have a good girly cry over a rewrite letter. It’s tough being abused. It would be tougher being dropped from a publisher’s list.

 

So, yesterday – which was a long rainy day, the perfect dreary kind that makes me want to curl up with a book (or a hobby) and play – I took off all day, made jewelry, and let my mind float free. Not that I was *totally* not writing. Because I’m OC too. I admit that my mind floated into the planning of my next proposal. I couldn’t help it. I’m just built that way. And…sigh…I’ll get another rewrite letter in a week, and I need to have the proposal done before that time so I can concentrate on the rewrite letter, have a girly cry, then settle down to the pleasant-horrid labor of rewriting. Gah… The (hopefully) never ending cycle of a writer’s life. 

 

This single day of mental vacation was intended to set my own OC mind free so that I can finish the proposal and be clearheaded to work through all the manuscript changes that will surely come, even though my new editor looks sweet and kind and young enough to be my own kid and looks totally not OC. In a good editor, looks can be deceiving. And probably, hopefully, are. I hope she will be a slash-and-burn kinda gal. And whip me and my manuscript into shape. Yeah. I am an *OC Masochist*. For me, that’s just another term for writer.

Faith

Book Release Day!

War has erupted among the five Old Races, and Margrit Knight is responsible for the death that caused it. Now New York City’s most unusual lawyer faces her toughest negotiation yet. And with her gargoyle lover, Alban, taken prisoner, Margrit’s only allies–a dragon bitter about his fall, a vampire determined to hold his standing at any cost and a mortal detective with no idea what he’s up against–have demands of their own.

Determined to rescue Alban and torn between conflicting loyalties as the battle seeps into the human world, Margrit soon realizes the only way out is through the fire….

Today is Release Day for HANDS OF FLAME, the third and final book in my Negotiator series!

Although this *book* wasn’t actually the culmination of 4 very long years of intensive writing, it’s the one that, in a lot of ways, completes the visual representation of all that work. When I sold my first book in 2004, I had a very clear and specific goal in mind: a certain amount of shelf space dedicated to my books. I’ve written over a million and a half words on the way to that goal, and now, with 3 Walker Papers (4, if you shelve the WINTER MOON novella along with them!) and 3 Negotiator books, as well as THE QUEEN’S BASTARD, there’s now starting to be a fair chunk of C.E. Murphy books on the shelf, and 3 hard-to-find Cate Dermody novels. I *like* the way that looks.

This is one of those things, I think, that…ain’t necessarily intuitive to consider, as a new writer going into the game. It’s astounding enough to get a contract. Thinking about what happens next, or happens five years down the road, is just too big.

On the other hand, this is a business. It’s important to have a business plan when you go into it. I recall, when I first sold, talking to Jennifer Jackson, who became my agent, about my goals. They were based on my expectations of myself–my knowledge of how fast I can write–and were therefore, ah, lofty. :) She was politely skeptical. Four years on, I’ve actually done what I proposed and am damned proud of that. It’s been a lot of hard work, but definitely worth it.

I don’t have anything really sage to say, except a game plan is good to have in place. That, and please go buy HANDS OF FLAME… :)

Distractions

I’m feeling very much the way Faith must have the other day.  I’ve got nothing to say this morning.  I have no idea what to write for this post.

I’ve been thinking about distractions lately, mostly because I seem to be very much aware of all of the things lying around my house that call to me while I’m trying to write.  The slow drain in our bathroom that I’m perfectly willing to ignore all weekend long, but which becomes A Problem That Must Be Dealt With Now once the work week begins again.  The pictures from our trip out West that I did work on over the weekend but have yet to finish processing.  Converage of the Democratic Convention, which is Everywhere right now and which is quite a pull for a political junkie like me.

The deadline for my current WIP is close enough that I’m aware of it, but not so close that I’m in danger of failing to meet it.  That’s not necessarily a good thing.  I work well under tight deadlines.  I get focused, I work efficiently, I ignore the superfluous stuff.  But right now I can safely blow off work for a few days and really not hurt myself.  And that’s dangerous.  Because when it comes right down to it, I WANT to finish this book as soon as I can.  I want to move on to my Shiny New Toy (my next project, for those of you who missed that post a while back), and I can only do that when I finish work on this one.

Meanwhile, I think about that book by Guy Gavriel Kay that I bought recently and haven’t started yet.  I glance at my laptop computer case and think about the cool games I have on my laptop but have kept off my desktop so that I’ll get my work done.  I think about all the really yummy snacks sitting in the pantry.  (Nancy made a trip to Trader Joe’s and the farmers’ market in Atlanta last week.  We have chips and chocolate, crackers and cookies, hummus and exotic cheeses.)

I think this is one reason so many of the legendary writers drank to excess.  It was something to do other than write.  It was a form of procrastination.   They couldn’t check out a friend’s blog or browse through the online catalog at B and H Photo or check for book titles at Amazon.  They didn’t have four dozen television channels at their disposal.  As it is, I’m amazed sometimes that I don’t have a drinking problem or snack myself sick every day.

The same old qualifiers apply here.  I love to write.  I love my job.  I’m very fortunate that I get to do this for a living.  But the fact is, some days I don’t want to write at all, and there are a million things to distract me from my work.  That’s the hardest part of the Put Butt In Chair credo.  My heart is in the right place (the write place?), as is my head.  I know what I ought to be doing.  But it’s so easy to do all that other stuff.  And the irony is that this blog, which is something I’ve committed to do every Monday, is itself a distraction that I’m using right now to avoid the other writing I’m supposed to do.  I’m using a post about distractions to distract myself.  It’s a self-referential diversion.  How very post-modern…..

All right.  Enough of this.  I should go and write.  Although it’s been a while since I played my guitar.  And I can’t help but notice that my music CDs are not very well organized….


Blog Catalog