Entries Tagged as 'David B. Coe'

So What’s Good About Being a Writer?

We’ve been focused a lot in recent days on the challenges inherent in a writing career.  Catie, with her usual eloquence and wit and style, has given us a sense of what it feels like to struggle with a book that’s more than half done; to confront that crucial scene that’s screaming to be written but isn’t quite ready to emerge.  I’ve been fighting with the opening pages of my own project, trying to overcome the inertia of the blank screen.  Misty has been enjoying the brilliant reviews her work has received, but she’s also dealing with the occasional bad review and the emotional cost even one bad critique can exact from a new writer.  And two days ago Faith wrote a wonderful post about the physical toll of fighting one’s way through a book.

The response to these posts has been great, and we’re glad to hear from people who tell us that they appreciate our honesty.  Professionals struggle with this stuff every day, and that can be a comforting thought for those who haven’t yet made that first sale, but who are already fighting the good fight.

But there’s got to be more, right?  We keep on posting all this stuff about how hard it is to write, but then we say, “But I love it.  I wouldn’t want to do anything else.”  Okay.  Why?  If the brochures all read, “Be a Writer!  Put Your Butt in the Chair!” we probably wouldn’t have too many writers out there.  So I guess the point of today’s post is (with apologies to Johnny Mercer) to accentuate the positive.

Or, put another way, what do I love about being a writer?

[Read more →]

Friday Fun: Joshua Palmatier!

Happy Friday, everyone! Please join me in welcoming Joshua Palmatier to the blog today! *wild applause*

Hey, everyone! I first want to thank everyone here at Magical Words for the guest blogging invite. Hopefully I’ll have something important to say. Or at least something of interest.

First, an introduction: My name is Joshua Palmatier and I’m a fantasy author, with three books currently out from DAW Books. All three are part of the Throne of Amenkor series. The first is called The Skewed Throne and introduces my main character, Varis, an orphan who’s barely surviving in the slums of Amenkor, but who gets trained by one of the city’s Seekers to become an assassin. She comes to despise her talents and then is given the ultimate mark: the Mistress, ruler of the city, who sits on the Skewed Throne. Her only obstacle is the Skewed Throne itself. It knows Varis is coming . . . and it’s insane.

Bwahahahahahahahaha!

I couldn’t resist the evil laugh. *grin* John Scalzi said I write about disturbed furniture . . . and he’s right. *sigh* But there are plenty of other things going on as well—an invading sea force! blue people! an inexplicable White Fire! and of course, death and destruction! Pretty much everyone who had to sum up my novels in one word used “gritty”. The cover for the third novel:

The Vacant Throne

gives you a pretty good vibe of what the series is all about. If you’d like to see more about the Throne of Amenkor series, including the two sequels The Cracked Throne and The Vacant Throne, check out my website at www.joshuapalmatier.com.

But enough about me and my books! I want to talk about something nearly every magical world needs, something completely non-controversial and guaranteed to create no waves: religion! Specifically, I’d like to talk about inventing a religion for you world. [Read more →]

A Writer’s Selection of Music for Writing

Looking back on my recent posts, I see that I’ve been Very Serious in every one of them, which really isn’t like me at all.  I guess this has been a Serious Time.  Lots of work, much of it not very much fun, sick kids, friends going through hard times.  Serious stuff.  But I want to do something fun this week, if for no other reason than because I need to, for my own well being.

So…..

I’ve posted before, elsewhere, about how important music is to my work.  When I’m writing a book, I have to have music on.  And not just any music.  I don’t do real well listening to rock or pop in any of its incarnations, mostly because I find that lyrics throw me off.  The last thing I need when I’m writing is someone else’s words kicking around in my head, repeating themselves in melodic, catchy little phrases. 

I also can’t listen to classical music.  Too static.  Our best friends here in town are both musicians and music professors.  They’re both into classical music and they’ve introduced Nancy and me to some wonderful performances.  I enjoy classical; Nancy and I went to hear the Nashville Symphony a couple of weeks ago and had a great time.  But when I’ve tried writing to classical, I’ve found it stultifying.  For me it’s like trying to do gymnastics in a tie and jacket.  It just doesn’t work.

So what does work?  Instrumental music with a strong improvisational element.  Specifically jazz and bluegrass.  I listen to a ton of both.  I find that listening to improvisation frees up my writing, helps me tap into a creative thread, almost as if I’m playing riffs right along with the musicians.  As I mentioned months ago in that previous post about music, when I used to play guitar more often than I do now I did a lot of instrumental soloing, and the feeling I get from writing on a good day is very much the same as I used to get from playing.  I have the sense that I’m in sync with a creative process that’s larger than just me.  And the music I listen to helps that along.

I know that some other writers are pretty picky about the music they listen to when writing, and that others feel they can’t have any music going at all.  I’d like to hear what you all listen to when you write, if anything.

But first, here are my top ten favorite discs to write to (in no particular order):

[Read more →]

We have a winner!

It was a tricky contest, and there were a lot of close guesses, but at the last minute, someone read the hints and pulled it out. So put your hands together, people, for our winner…. Beatriz

She correctly guessed that it was Faith, David, Catie and Misty.  Beatriz, I’ll get in touch offlist to arrange for your fabulous prize (well, maybe not fabulous, but it’s a prize!)

Thanks for playing, everyone! We’ll be having another quiz soon, so keep watching this spot for more Friday Fun. And please drop by this Friday, April 4, to spend some time with our marvelous guest blogger, Joshua Palmatier! He’s the author of the Throne of Amenkor series, and he’ll be discussing how to create a religion for your fantasy world. Don’t miss it!

Friday Fun Time!

It’s Friday! Woo hoo! In honor of getting to the weekend relatively unscathed, we at Magical Words are challenging you, our readers.

The four hosts of Magical Words were asked the following question:

“You’ve gone to the local coffee shop to indulge yourself for an hour. What do you order?”

Their answers are:

A. A large chai tea latte, non fat, with a couple shots of raspberry. A low fat coffee cake, either blueberry or cinnamon. Or a cinnamon Danish if I’ve been virtuous all week. Man…That is just sooo girlie. I shoulda said a black coffee, and added that I topped it off with a shot of brandy from a flask in my tote. I’ve done that before too, in my wilder younger days.

B. Coffee makes me jittery, hyper. My hands shake under the best of conditions; give me coffee and I’m a total wreck. I’d get a Chai Latte. And sugar. Must have sugar. A big soft oatmeal raisin cookie maybe. Or chocolate chip (also big; also soft). And because work has no place in this fantasy, I’d bring my laptop and spend the entire time cruising around Ebay.

C. I’ll order the darkest hot chocolate on the menu and spend the next two hours copyediting manuscripts. Hrm. That doesn’t sound much like indulging myself, does it?

D. A medium latte, no sugar and no flavoring, and a toffee bar, if they happen to be in stock. I swear, every baked goodie I fall in love with goes out of stock. I used to love pistachio muffins, but the coffee shop that sold them went out of business. Maybe I should publicly announce my love of bran-carrot-banana cake, just to watch it vanish, too.

So here’s the challenge - whose order is whose? Post in comments with your answer. The first person who guesses all four answers correctly (we’ll announce on Monday morning) will receive huge accolades and the pride of being our first winner. And maybe even a toy surprise if we can arrange it!

So start guessing, and have a great weekend!

Why Conventions?

Tomorrow I drive to Virginia — Charlottesville to be exact – where, on Friday, I’ll be a presenter at the Virginia Festival of the Book.  It couldn’t come at a worse time, really.  I’m revising one book and itching to start writing another.  But this begins a stretch of festivals and conventions that will take me through the summer and into the fall, so I suppose I have no choice but to deal with it.

I don’t do a tremendous number of conventions each year (from here on out, “conventions” will include not only conventions, but also book festivals and any other events that allow me to interact with fans and other writers); maybe I do eight total.  It’s enough to make me feel at the end of each year that I never want to do so many again.  But it’s few enough that I wind up scheduling the same number again come January, so I guess that’s a balance of a sort.

Lots of people ask me if I enjoy conventions.  The short answer is a qualified yes.  I enjoy some conventions very much.  World Fantasy Convention is always a highlight of my year.  No matter where WFC is held, I get to see writer friends who I never see anywhere else.  My editor and agent, both of whom I like very much, are usually there, so I also get to touch base with them.

Other conventions demand more work on my part, which is not to say that I don’t enjoy them, but this does make for a different kind of experience.  I usually attend conventions to promote my books.  It’s part of my job — self-promotion.  I try to get onto as many discussion panels as I can, I try to do readings and autographings, and I spend a good deal of time in the dealers’ room shmoozing with booksellers and readers.   All of these activities have their ups and downs.  Panels can be fun, particularly if you get a lively group of panelists and an audience that asks good questions.  True, one can only speak intelligently about “Creating Religions for Your World” or “What’s Your Favorite Fantasy Novel and Why?” (Mine, because I get money when you buy it…..) so many times before one’s brain begins to gel.  But I’ve been on some great panels over the years.  I’ve also been on some total dogs, but let’s not go there.

Readings can also be terrific or disastrous.  It doesn’t take a big audience to make a reading great.  I’ve done readings for six people that left me completely energized about my books and eager to get back to work.  I’ve also done readings for two people and had one of them fall asleep.  That kind of sucked.  And once I got to the reading venue just as the con guest of honor was finishing a reading.  She left and took every person with her.  I sat alone in the room for fifteen minutes.  Then I went to the bar.

Autographings are similar to readings in a way.  Hit or miss.  If people show up, they’re great.  If you’re sitting there for an hour staring at a wall while people walk by trying not to make eye contact. . . .well, that’s pretty much the pits.

People who know me will probably be surprised to hear me say this, but the shmoozing is the part of a con that I dislike most.  I’m not a natural shmoozer.  I love talking to friends, but I find it very difficult to make conversation.  I’ll warm up to it after a while, but it’s . . . well . . . work

Which brings us back to the central point.  Conventions are fun.  I look forward to every one that’s on my schedule.  I enjoy seeing old friends and making new ones, both among my fellow writers and among the many readers who attend these events because they’re passionate about the genre.  But conventions aren’t really a time for me to kick back and relax.  I have to be on pretty much the entire time.  I try to be friendly.  When I talk about writing or my books or whatever topics might come up in panel discussions, I want to be informative and concise.  I also want to be funny.  I want to interest people in my work.  But perhaps more to the point, people pay to attend these conventions, and while I’d never be so egotistical as to think that they’re paying to see me, I am conscious of the fact that I am, in essence, part of the entertainment.  My panels, my readings — they’re part of what the attendees have paid to experience.  If I go at it half-assed, it reflects poorly on me, and it cheats good people out of their money.

So if you see me at a con, please come up and say hello.  Help me get through the shmoozing part.  Come to my panels and ask good questions.  Come hear me read.  Come by the autographing table, even if it’s just to say hello or have me sign the con program.  Yeah, I’ll be working.  But as it happens, I have pretty fun job, and I like to talk about it.

Today’s music:  Larry Carlton (Sapphire Blue)

Creative Professions, Creative Outlets

Last Friday I hung my first one-man photography show in a local gallery.  I’ve been a dedicated amateur photographer for a long time now, though I’ve only gotten serious about it in the last four years or so.  I have photos hanging in a second gallery here in town, alongside the work of other local artists.  But as I say, this new exhibit, which opened Monday and runs through mid-May, is my first solo venture.

What does this have to do with writing?  Nothing.  And everything.  Allow me to go off on another artistic tangent.  I’m also a musician.  I sing, and I’ve been playing guitar for over thirty years.  I played quite a bit when I was younger — high school, college, graduate school.  Once I started writing fiction professionally, and I assumed for a long time that this was because my profession provided me with the creative outlet I used to get from my music.  I’ve come to realize, though, that the reason was slightly different.  I’ve always been a decent singer and at my best I played guitar pretty well.  But I never learned to write my own songs, at least not good ones.  I got a rush from performing, but once my performing days were over I began to lose interest.  It wasn’t that writing replaced music as my creative outlet.  Rather, music no longer felt creative.  I can play lots of songs — and I enjoy singing for my girls – but I don’t create music so much as replicate other people’s songs:  James Taylor, Paul Simon, the Dead, John Hiatt, Jackson Browne, etc.

Photography, on the other hand, is all mine.  It is an entirely creative endeavor and it draws upon my artistic instincts in ways that complement my writing.  Part of what I do as a writer, in addition to creating characters and worlds and storylines, is translate visual imagery to words.  Last week Catie wrote about visualization, and I commented that I do indeed visualize as I write.  I picture a scene or a person in my mind and then describe what I “see”. 

With photography, I don’t have to translate.  It’s a different kind of challenge.  Photography is about finding a story without the use of words.  It’s about looking at a scene or an object and deciding what to include in the image and what to leave out, how to frame it, how to orient it.  In a sense it’s about imposing order and narrative on visual stimuli that are, at times, inherently chaotic.  It’s about finding patterns — not necessarily symmetrical patterns of the type we’re taught to make as children, but patterns that draw the eye to certain elements of the image.  It’s about light and shadow, color and form, movement — yes, movement, even in a still photo — and stasis.  In many ways, I believe photography is the perfect creative outlet for a writer, because writers and photographers approach imagery and narrative from opposite directions and wind up in very similar places.

Photography forces me to see details and visual motifs that I believe I’d otherwise miss.  And this, in turn, enhances the descriptive passages I put in my writing.  I think that my interest in music has helped me find rhythms and dynamics in my storytelling that improve my prose. 

But that’s just me.  The larger point I’m trying to make is that like so many other writers I know, the creativity demanded of me by my profession doesn’t satisfy completely my artistic needs.  I know so many writers who are also painters, musicians, photographers, dancers.  This isn’t to say that I don’t know lots of musicians or visual artists who pursue other forms of art, but this is so prevalent among the writers I know that it makes me wonder if there’s something larger at work. 

Is there something inherent in writing that makes us seek out other arts as well?  Are those of you who write professionally also engaged in other artistic pursuits?  How do they influence your writing, if at all?  For those of you who write more as a hobby, do you have other creative hobbies as well, and if so, how does these other forms of creativity interact with your writing?

Revisions

Last week I received comments back from a short story editor who is interested in buying story of mine.  He likes the piece, but feels that it still needs a bit of work before it’s ready to go in his publication.  Yesterday I received the first 200 manuscript pages of my next book, book II in my Blood of the Southlands trilogy, back from my editor at Tor.  He likes what I’ve done with the book and is excited about where I’m taking the series, but he’d scrawled comments all over the pages — things he thinks I should consider changing or expanding or cutting.

When people talk to me about the process of writing a book, they tend to focus on the initial creative act, the writing of that first draft.  When they ask about the editing process, they tend to think in terms of typos and changes in syntax. Too often, it seems to me, discussions of novel writing ignore the revision stage.  I believe that some of the most important work I do on any book, and certainly the most valuable contributions my editor makes to that finished product, come in this part of the process.

[Read more →]

My Favorite

As an author, I like to think that my latest book is my best book.  I look back on my first couple of novels, and while I still feel a certain pride in that early work, I also cringe at some passages.  I believe that I have been steadily improving my craft over the past decade and at this point, with eleven books written (nine of them in print, one in the the pipeline, one waiting to be sold) spanning four different series, I feel that I’ve come a long way from those first efforts.

So when I’m asked, “What’s your best book?” I usually name my most recent publication.  When I’m asked, “Which book of yours should I read first?” I’ll usually recommend the first book of my current series.  But occasionally I’m asked, “What’s your favorite of all your books?”  That’s another matter entirely.

Certain books of mine are dearer to me than others.  This has nothing to do with how good or how flawed I might think they are.  It has everything to do with the emotions I drew upon when I wrote them, with the characters I encountered as I developed them, and with what milestones they might represent in my career.  My favorites of those books I’ve published so far are The Outlanders, the middle book of my first trilogy, and Weavers of War, the final book of my Forelands series.

The Outlanders is one of those books that I mentioned in the first paragraph.  Yeah, there are parts of the novel that make me cringe and cover my face and say “No!  Tell me I didn’t actually write that!  How did that get past my editor?”  (Always easiest to blame the editor.  I mean, I’m just the writer.  It couldn’t be my fault, right?)   But the book is special for me in a couple of ways.  I’d known that I had one book in me.  I’d been writing Children of Amarid in my head for the better part of a decade before I actually sat down to write it.  But I wasn’t convinced that I could write a second book, or that I could make it as good as the first.  Turns out I made it better.  The Outlanders convinced me that I could make a career of writing.

It also introduced me to characters who remain to this day some of the best I’ve ever written.  They were complex and conflicted, and they surprised me again and again.  I had more fun writing The Outlanders than I’ve had with any other book.  I challenged myself, I did things with character and plot that I hadn’t known I could do.  I learned a tremendous amount.  All of which was good, because I lost both my parents while writing that book.  I wrote it during the most difficult emotional time of my life.  And that book, along with my wife and first child (the second hadn’t been born yet), were all that kept me sane.  So yeah, it’s my favorite.  Not my best, but the one I love most.

Weavers of War, on the other hand, is absolutely one of my best.  But I love it for a slightly different reason.  The final book of the LonTobyn series, Eagle-Sage, received a lot of criticism from people who thought that it didn’t do a good enough job of completing the series.  It offered resolution, but I think some people felt that the book didn’t peak quite as high as it should have.  And though I think it was the best I could do at the time, I have also wondered if I just wasn’t very good at ending a series.  With Weavers of War, I proved to myself that I could write a kick-ass series conclusion.  That probably sounds self-serving and full of myself, but that’s okay.  We all have our insecurities in whatever profession we pursue, and authors are no different.  This was my biggest insecurity, and Weavers helped me get over it.

One of the books I’ve yet to publish, or even sell – the first book in my contemporary fantasy — is my other favorite.  It represents a huge departure for me: the first novel I’ve written that isn’t epic fantasy.  Again, as with The Outlanders, I love this book because it challenged me, forced me to grow as an artist, introduced me to characters who are unlike any I’ve written before, and ultimately showed me that I could do more as a writer than I had ever believed.  I guess that’s what makes me fall in love with a book:  that struggle to become more than I am, to stretch myself, to step out of my creative comfort zone.

So, fellow writers, never mind which book is your best or the one I should read first.  Which of the books you’ve written is your favorite?

More than An Escape

Expanding a bit on Misty’s wonderful post the other day, “What Drugs Were You On When You Wrote This?”….

There are lots of attitudes I encounter with respect to the kind of writing I do, ranging from the general snobbery directed at genre novels by writers and readers of so-called Literary Fiction, to the less offensive but equally annoying assumption that I must be writing books for children because what adult in his or her right mind would read such things.  But what bothers me most, what to my mind reveals the greatest ignorance about what fantasy and science fiction writers do, is the equating by some people of speculative fiction with escapism.

Never mind the obvious:  That throughout the history of the novel, some of the most pointed social critiques ever written have been fantastical in nature.  1984, Brave New World, A Connecticut Yankee In King Arthur’s Court, Looking Backward, Moby Dick, most of the work of Nathaniel Hawthorne and Edgar Allen Poe.

The fact is that fantasy and science fiction are not escapist.  Rather, stories and novels written in these genres allow us to look at our world through lenses that are both unique and edifying.  They present worlds that, while sometimes alien and exotic, continue to grapple with the same social, cultural, moral, and political issues that we struggle with in our own world.  They offer glimpses of our possible futures, or tantalizing alternatives to our known past.  Read Neil Gaiman’s wondrous and strange takes on mythology, or George Martin’s interpretation of medieval intrigue and warfare, or Guy Gavriel Kay’s richly textured recreations of ancient European and Mediterrainean societies, and you cannot help but come away with a greater understanding of our own history and belief systems.  Read the work of Stephen R. Donaldson, or Nicola Griffith, or dozens of other writers whose books merit mention here, and you will find yourself reflecting on the human condition in ways that you’d never considered before.

As a writer of fantasy, I don’t attempt to give my readers a means of escape.  Instead, I hope to make them think in new ways about issues relating to ecology, technology, race and prejudice, gender and ethnic identity.  I have a project in the works that focuses on drug addiction.  By creating a world in which the archetypes are different and the familiar stereotypes don’t exist, I hope to offer my readers a fresh perspective on matters.  Remove the discussion of race from the emotionally charged terms of the American race debate, for instance, and perhaps people will finally find a way past old biases and hostilities.  Introduce magic to the dichotomy between technology and pastoral ways of life, and maybe the choices we face as a society will come into focus in a new way.

Do our books entertain?  I should hope so.  Do they present us with imagery and characters and settings that stretch the imagination?  Absolutely.  But to assume that this is all they do, is to see in speculative fiction far less than is actually there.  This isn’t escapism.  This is life.

Today’s music:  Joe Beck


Blog Catalog