Entries Tagged as ''

A Writer’s Tools

A question was asked on magicalwords.net recently about why writing sometimes sounds amateurish. I spouted off with the answer as I saw it:

*(paraphrasing) my work looks amateurish.
The main and usual reason is that you are telling not showing. The second reason is loss of character voice.

 

Telling Ex: Chris was sweating, the day was muggy. The fan didn’t help. (note: no voice, little setting, no emotional content)

 

Showing Ex: Sweat trickled down Chris’s back, sticking his shirt to his skin like salty glue. The fan was welcome, but more as a distraction than anything else. Nothing was going to combat the muggy August heat. He turned his face to artificial breeze and tried to think of snow. Or maybe a working air conditioner. (note voice, setting, emotional content)

 

 

Back to today’s blog… But then I got to thinking about why some writers have such polish with their work on the first draft, and some of us have to work at it. And why sometimes I’m in one group and sometimes I’m in the other. It’s partly the *tools of the trade*.

Writers have tools in our tool boxes just like any other worker—say a builder. A builder starts with a drawing; I start with an outline. Builder puts in a foundation; I do a first chapter. For me, the first chapter is the foundation that I build upon throughout the rest of the book. If something changes in a later chapter, about a character or a plot point, I have to tear out portions of the foundation (and the walls and roof, sometimes) and make it fit.

But it gets more subtle than that as I delve into a book, putting it together, building it. BTW, *building a book* is a term I’ve often used. Walls are the world I build for a reader to begin to set aside his believability issues. If the world isn’t right, why would a reader believe in magic? If the world I build doesn’t need magic, then why would I set a world there?

Windows are the setting, the things the characters feel and do that provide continuity for the reader. In a house, when a window opens onto the brick façade of the next building, it *ruins the view*. Same with setting. It is the view the reader has of the particular moment in time in the overall world. I have to set the place and time and keep it fresh through a scene as well as through the book.

Emotional transitions are like a builder’s decorating choice, color for the rooms. One room in my book has to flow naturally into the next. No jarring transitions, say a purple room and then a buttercup yellow room. Unless I *want* a reader to feel the emotional jar. When an important character dies, it better be a jar to the reader. If not, I haven’t done my job.

The roof holds a building together, provides the strength when winds press against one wall, then another. The roof of my novel is the plot outline, with its arcs and crests and troughs. No, I don’t build an outline the way a lot of writers teach it, in a graph of rising and falling action moving the character to the final conflict. But something has to happen every 10 pages, building and releasing the stresses of the story line.

Power words are like a builder’s finishing touches, words with emotional content must be just right. Scurried instead of slunk. Ripped off instead of stole. Or vice versa. Just like the right light fixture or bathroom fixture can give a room emotional tone, the right word gives a reader emotional tone. Varying sentence structure helps with this too, of course, giving a pulse and breath to writing.

These are just some of the tools in a writer’s tool box. There’s bait, the five or six main methods of character description, the wave formula, and dozens of other devices a writer can use. Do I think of them when I write? No. But I occasionally study them between books, reminding myself not to get stale in the way I build a world or present a character.

Lack of staleness is the gift of a very few, very great writers: Leonard Elmore comes to mind. Every single one of his books is written with a different voice  If a book didn’t have his name on the cover I’d never know he was the author when I start to read. But they all have this sharp, barbed, stabbing intensity, that you *feel* as you read. It’s his gift. Natural tools in his tool box.

And I guess that is where I come back to the beginning. Writing is something that resides deep in our souls, like a seed that needs nourishment to bust open and reach for the sun. But to make it reach and flourish I have to have tools in my tool box and be willing to use them. Which bring us to my number one role of writing:Butt in chair.Faith      

We have a winner!

It was a tricky contest, and there were a lot of close guesses, but at the last minute, someone read the hints and pulled it out. So put your hands together, people, for our winner…. Beatriz

She correctly guessed that it was Faith, David, Catie and Misty.  Beatriz, I’ll get in touch offlist to arrange for your fabulous prize (well, maybe not fabulous, but it’s a prize!)

Thanks for playing, everyone! We’ll be having another quiz soon, so keep watching this spot for more Friday Fun. And please drop by this Friday, April 4, to spend some time with our marvelous guest blogger, Joshua Palmatier! He’s the author of the Throne of Amenkor series, and he’ll be discussing how to create a religion for your fantasy world. Don’t miss it!

Friday Fun Time!

It’s Friday! Woo hoo! In honor of getting to the weekend relatively unscathed, we at Magical Words are challenging you, our readers.

The four hosts of Magical Words were asked the following question:

“You’ve gone to the local coffee shop to indulge yourself for an hour. What do you order?”

Their answers are:

A. A large chai tea latte, non fat, with a couple shots of raspberry. A low fat coffee cake, either blueberry or cinnamon. Or a cinnamon Danish if I’ve been virtuous all week. Man…That is just sooo girlie. I shoulda said a black coffee, and added that I topped it off with a shot of brandy from a flask in my tote. I’ve done that before too, in my wilder younger days.

B. Coffee makes me jittery, hyper. My hands shake under the best of conditions; give me coffee and I’m a total wreck. I’d get a Chai Latte. And sugar. Must have sugar. A big soft oatmeal raisin cookie maybe. Or chocolate chip (also big; also soft). And because work has no place in this fantasy, I’d bring my laptop and spend the entire time cruising around Ebay.

C. I’ll order the darkest hot chocolate on the menu and spend the next two hours copyediting manuscripts. Hrm. That doesn’t sound much like indulging myself, does it?

D. A medium latte, no sugar and no flavoring, and a toffee bar, if they happen to be in stock. I swear, every baked goodie I fall in love with goes out of stock. I used to love pistachio muffins, but the coffee shop that sold them went out of business. Maybe I should publicly announce my love of bran-carrot-banana cake, just to watch it vanish, too.

So here’s the challenge - whose order is whose? Post in comments with your answer. The first person who guesses all four answers correctly (we’ll announce on Monday morning) will receive huge accolades and the pride of being our first winner. And maybe even a toy surprise if we can arrange it!

So start guessing, and have a great weekend!

Today the delete key is my friend.

Just call me the Duchess of Deletion.

I started to blog about how it hurts to see one bad review even if forty-’leven other people have given your book raves.  I decided I didn’t feel like being depressed about it, and I didn’t want people to think I was begging for sympathy.  I erased that post.

I started another post about what I’ve learned from doing book signings, and realized I haven’t learned enough yet.  Let me do some more, and then I’ll have something entertaining to say.  That one’s gone.

So now here I am, the clock ticking on my day, and me without a decent topic.  I’m opening the floor…what do YOU want to know?  Ask one of us, ask us all.
Play nicely, please.  :D

Why Conventions?

Tomorrow I drive to Virginia — Charlottesville to be exact – where, on Friday, I’ll be a presenter at the Virginia Festival of the Book.  It couldn’t come at a worse time, really.  I’m revising one book and itching to start writing another.  But this begins a stretch of festivals and conventions that will take me through the summer and into the fall, so I suppose I have no choice but to deal with it.

I don’t do a tremendous number of conventions each year (from here on out, “conventions” will include not only conventions, but also book festivals and any other events that allow me to interact with fans and other writers); maybe I do eight total.  It’s enough to make me feel at the end of each year that I never want to do so many again.  But it’s few enough that I wind up scheduling the same number again come January, so I guess that’s a balance of a sort.

Lots of people ask me if I enjoy conventions.  The short answer is a qualified yes.  I enjoy some conventions very much.  World Fantasy Convention is always a highlight of my year.  No matter where WFC is held, I get to see writer friends who I never see anywhere else.  My editor and agent, both of whom I like very much, are usually there, so I also get to touch base with them.

Other conventions demand more work on my part, which is not to say that I don’t enjoy them, but this does make for a different kind of experience.  I usually attend conventions to promote my books.  It’s part of my job — self-promotion.  I try to get onto as many discussion panels as I can, I try to do readings and autographings, and I spend a good deal of time in the dealers’ room shmoozing with booksellers and readers.   All of these activities have their ups and downs.  Panels can be fun, particularly if you get a lively group of panelists and an audience that asks good questions.  True, one can only speak intelligently about “Creating Religions for Your World” or “What’s Your Favorite Fantasy Novel and Why?” (Mine, because I get money when you buy it…..) so many times before one’s brain begins to gel.  But I’ve been on some great panels over the years.  I’ve also been on some total dogs, but let’s not go there.

Readings can also be terrific or disastrous.  It doesn’t take a big audience to make a reading great.  I’ve done readings for six people that left me completely energized about my books and eager to get back to work.  I’ve also done readings for two people and had one of them fall asleep.  That kind of sucked.  And once I got to the reading venue just as the con guest of honor was finishing a reading.  She left and took every person with her.  I sat alone in the room for fifteen minutes.  Then I went to the bar.

Autographings are similar to readings in a way.  Hit or miss.  If people show up, they’re great.  If you’re sitting there for an hour staring at a wall while people walk by trying not to make eye contact. . . .well, that’s pretty much the pits.

People who know me will probably be surprised to hear me say this, but the shmoozing is the part of a con that I dislike most.  I’m not a natural shmoozer.  I love talking to friends, but I find it very difficult to make conversation.  I’ll warm up to it after a while, but it’s . . . well . . . work

Which brings us back to the central point.  Conventions are fun.  I look forward to every one that’s on my schedule.  I enjoy seeing old friends and making new ones, both among my fellow writers and among the many readers who attend these events because they’re passionate about the genre.  But conventions aren’t really a time for me to kick back and relax.  I have to be on pretty much the entire time.  I try to be friendly.  When I talk about writing or my books or whatever topics might come up in panel discussions, I want to be informative and concise.  I also want to be funny.  I want to interest people in my work.  But perhaps more to the point, people pay to attend these conventions, and while I’d never be so egotistical as to think that they’re paying to see me, I am conscious of the fact that I am, in essence, part of the entertainment.  My panels, my readings — they’re part of what the attendees have paid to experience.  If I go at it half-assed, it reflects poorly on me, and it cheats good people out of their money.

So if you see me at a con, please come up and say hello.  Help me get through the shmoozing part.  Come to my panels and ask good questions.  Come hear me read.  Come by the autographing table, even if it’s just to say hello or have me sign the con program.  Yeah, I’ll be working.  But as it happens, I have pretty fun job, and I like to talk about it.

Today’s music:  Larry Carlton (Sapphire Blue)

No, no, this time it really *is* awful…

I’m in the middle–and I do mean middle, as I’m 90K into what I’m beginning to be depressingly certain will be a 165K book–of writing my sixteenth full-length novel.

These are my observations at this point:

- this is the worst thing I’ve ever written

- none of it hangs together

- there is no integral structure

- the end is so far away I will never be finished writing, but I am more than ready to be done

- my editor is going to burst into tears when I finally do turn this horrific lump in to her

- she is then going to have to find a way to break it to me gently that perhaps I should consider a career in shoveling elephant dung, because my writing life is over and cleaning up behind elephants is sure to be a less smelly job than what I’ve just delivered to her

The bitter thing is that I recognize this stage. This happens every time. It means that things are probably going along just fine, even though my inclination is to say, “No, no, I know I’ve said this before, but this time I think I’m right. This really is terrible.”

Recognizing this does not make me feel any better at all.

Almost every writer I know goes through this. This is the one where they’re going to figure out I’m a fraud. This is the point at which I wonder why I do this, because this really really sucks. The joy is gone. The focus is gone. All that’s left is a vast wasteland and a pathetic hope that if I keep throwing drivel at the screen something vaguely readable will come out of it. So on and so forth, etc, etc, etc.

I mention it because it often comes as an enormous relief to writers who are trying to break in: oh, they say, it’s not just me?

It’s not just you. It really isn’t. It’s almost all of us. And the only damned way to get through it is to keep writing, and eventually reach the end, and look back and hopefully say, “…well, okay, maybe it’s not *that* bad after all…”

…which comes as a surprise every time.

The Importance of a NAME

I was talking with one of my agents (the *not-so-warm-and-fuzzy* one) about writer names. To this point, I’ve been lucky to use names of my own, not that Hunter was mine from birth, but I was lucky enough to marry into it. And not that my family name is awful, but it is odd. There are 50,000 people with my family name in the US and only half of us pronounce it correctly. Prater, with a long A. Not a short A, all nasally. I was definitely not going to write with a potentially-nasally name. *Shudders.*

I wanted to start my career with Faith Hunter, but it sounded soooo made up. A mystery / thriller / blood-guts-and-gore writer named Faith Hunter? (Sounds of *not-so-warm-and-fuzzy* agent blowing a raspberry.)

Even more difficult, however, was the choice of a name for my fantasy writing. I mean, come on, a fantasy writer with the name of Faith Hunter? One who writes about a world with winged, *holy* beings of immeasurable power? Like in the Bible? Faith? Hunter? How hokey is that? But I liked it. It was mine, by a twist of fate and romance. I had to push the idea, but I got my wish on that one.

Others in this group have great writer names. Catie went with C.E., David went with … David. Misty Massey’s name sounds made up but it’s really hers, also with the benefit of fate and romance. (Waves at Philip McAvery, Rogue About Town and mind-blowing poet.) Just curious, but – any reason why each of you chose to write with the name you did? Did you consider another? Are you happy with your choice? I have writer friends with several names, for privacy’s sake.

Now, however, it is time to change my mystery writing career around a bit, take it in a new direction, and give it a kick in the butt. I am liking the idea, let me tell you. A new name with pizzazz, a different slant on the writing, maybe a sports, outdoors series, or a belly-dancing sleuth. Or something. And that means a new name. One that carries the feeling of the writing in it. Like, if I was doing a series set on the high seas, I’d be Davie Yada Yada Jones. Or writing about a belly dancing sleuth, I’d be Valletta or Sapphire or Yasmine, with a character named something equally exotic.

So, any ideas guys? I’m leaning for the outdoors stuff. Multiple third person POV, with both the male and female lead characters having their POV used. I’d start with a kayaking story, natch, and then move to hiking or horseback trail-riding into the wilderness. What kinda a name? I’m open to ideas…

Faith

The editor can fix that…

A student came in yesterday and asked me to take a look at a book he’s writing.  Generally speaking, I’ve adopted the very wise policy of many of my fellows, and stopped looking at the work of hopefuls.  There are liability problems, not to mention I just don’t have the time to spend fixing someone else’s manuscript when mine isn’t finished.  But I felt a certain responsibility toward the student, so I agreed to give it a look.

He’d handwritten six pages in pencil on notebook paper.  It was full of telling instead of showing, it was lacking in the kind of detail that might catch a reader’s interest, and he changed verb tenses with every sentence.  I could tell that he wanted to make it better, so I carefully, cautiously pointed out ways I thought he could improve his work.  He seemed to accept my suggestions, until we reached the grammar.  “Doesn’t the editor fix that?” he asked.

Uh….no.

Your editor will read your work and tell you what doesn’t fit.  She will answer your questions, help you come up with titles, laugh with you over your crazy book trailer (or maybe that was just me!)   She will send you jpegs of your cover sketches and squeal with you over them.  She will remind you when your deadlines are looming, pass along the tearsheets of good reviews and reassure you that the ugly ones don’t define you and your work.  But she will not write one word of your book.

One of the things expected of published people is a grasp of the fundamentals of grammar.  Telling a story in the written medium requires that the writer be able to communicate clearly to all readers of the language in which he’s writing.  This is one of those times when you must know the rules before you can break them.   One or two accidental mistakes in a manuscript are okay.  We all muff things now and then.  If you, the writer, can’t see that you’re writing a sentence in past tense, followed by one in present, and then a third in past imperfect, then back to past again …. you’re not ready for the market.

Granted I’ve only worked with one editor, so there could be editors out there who will do all that work for you.  But I’d venture to say they are few and far between.  It’s still better to get it right the first time, so that your editor can busy herself with all the fun stuff I mentioned before.  Wouldn’t you rather keep your editor happy?

Creative Professions, Creative Outlets

Last Friday I hung my first one-man photography show in a local gallery.  I’ve been a dedicated amateur photographer for a long time now, though I’ve only gotten serious about it in the last four years or so.  I have photos hanging in a second gallery here in town, alongside the work of other local artists.  But as I say, this new exhibit, which opened Monday and runs through mid-May, is my first solo venture.

What does this have to do with writing?  Nothing.  And everything.  Allow me to go off on another artistic tangent.  I’m also a musician.  I sing, and I’ve been playing guitar for over thirty years.  I played quite a bit when I was younger — high school, college, graduate school.  Once I started writing fiction professionally, and I assumed for a long time that this was because my profession provided me with the creative outlet I used to get from my music.  I’ve come to realize, though, that the reason was slightly different.  I’ve always been a decent singer and at my best I played guitar pretty well.  But I never learned to write my own songs, at least not good ones.  I got a rush from performing, but once my performing days were over I began to lose interest.  It wasn’t that writing replaced music as my creative outlet.  Rather, music no longer felt creative.  I can play lots of songs — and I enjoy singing for my girls – but I don’t create music so much as replicate other people’s songs:  James Taylor, Paul Simon, the Dead, John Hiatt, Jackson Browne, etc.

Photography, on the other hand, is all mine.  It is an entirely creative endeavor and it draws upon my artistic instincts in ways that complement my writing.  Part of what I do as a writer, in addition to creating characters and worlds and storylines, is translate visual imagery to words.  Last week Catie wrote about visualization, and I commented that I do indeed visualize as I write.  I picture a scene or a person in my mind and then describe what I “see”. 

With photography, I don’t have to translate.  It’s a different kind of challenge.  Photography is about finding a story without the use of words.  It’s about looking at a scene or an object and deciding what to include in the image and what to leave out, how to frame it, how to orient it.  In a sense it’s about imposing order and narrative on visual stimuli that are, at times, inherently chaotic.  It’s about finding patterns — not necessarily symmetrical patterns of the type we’re taught to make as children, but patterns that draw the eye to certain elements of the image.  It’s about light and shadow, color and form, movement — yes, movement, even in a still photo — and stasis.  In many ways, I believe photography is the perfect creative outlet for a writer, because writers and photographers approach imagery and narrative from opposite directions and wind up in very similar places.

Photography forces me to see details and visual motifs that I believe I’d otherwise miss.  And this, in turn, enhances the descriptive passages I put in my writing.  I think that my interest in music has helped me find rhythms and dynamics in my storytelling that improve my prose. 

But that’s just me.  The larger point I’m trying to make is that like so many other writers I know, the creativity demanded of me by my profession doesn’t satisfy completely my artistic needs.  I know so many writers who are also painters, musicians, photographers, dancers.  This isn’t to say that I don’t know lots of musicians or visual artists who pursue other forms of art, but this is so prevalent among the writers I know that it makes me wonder if there’s something larger at work. 

Is there something inherent in writing that makes us seek out other arts as well?  Are those of you who write professionally also engaged in other artistic pursuits?  How do they influence your writing, if at all?  For those of you who write more as a hobby, do you have other creative hobbies as well, and if so, how does these other forms of creativity interact with your writing?

The Great Plot Synopsis Project

I am *totally cheating* today and crossposting from my regular journal, my writing journal, and Magical Words, because the stars have aligned and planets have converted and it’s just easier that way. Approximately half the universe seems to be participating in this project, including David and Misty, so you might get a lot of synopsis blogs over this week. :) A list of other participants is here.

So, after all those excuses: a couple of weeks ago I got email from Joshua Palmatier inviting me to participate in the Great Plot Synopsis Project, wherein he was asking a bunch of published writers to post a book synopsis in order to help show aspiring writers how they’re done. (Joshua keeps having good ideas like this and then *following through on them*. I think he’s an alien.) So today is the Great Plot Synopsis Project Post Day, and I’m posting. :)

I have blatantly stolen the Synopsis Q&A Joshua posted in the post that inspired all of this.

Please note that there are SPOILERS for URBAN SHAMAN behind this cut. The book synopsis is replicated in its entirety. As it happens, because of how this particular synopsis is written, it’s not *very* spoilery, but it is spoilery! So be warned, and now you can, if you wish,

[Read more →]