Point of View: Single vs. Multiple
Those of you who have read any of my books know that I like to tell a story from the perspective of several different point of view characters. (A point of view — POV – character, for those who are unfamiliar with the term, is simply the character whose head we’re inside as we write or read a book. For the Harry Potter books the POV character is always Harry. For a book like Tigana, by Guy Gavriel Kay, or with my Winds of the Forelands books, the POV shifts from character to character with each new chapter or chapter section. The alternative to writing with POV characters is writing with an omniscient narrative voice, which I just hate. Why? Because I find, as a reader, that it distances me from the characters, and it’s just not as interesting. I read — and write — because I like to get inside people’s minds, to see what makes them tick. An omniscient voice doesn’t really allow that.)
Writing in multiple points of view has many advantages. It allows an author to piece together a complex story without requiring a single character to know and see everything. It makes it possible to give more information to your reader than you’ve given to your main character, which in turn makes it possible to rachet up the tension and the sense that your beloved protagonist is in danger. And finally, as my comments about omniscient voice imply, it helps with character development, by putting your reader inside the thoughts and emotions of several characters.
And yet, with my new project I’ve chosen to limit myself to a single POV, and I’m finding it challenging. Why would I do this? After all the things I just said about how much I like writing in multiple POV, why would I choose to write from the viewpoint of a single character? Well, because this has certain advantages, too. With a single POV character, readers tend to grow quite attached to that character, and since this new project revolves around this one character, this is a good thing. Also, this new series has a strong mystery component, and by writing from a single POV, and keeping that character in the dark about certain things, I heighten the sense of mystery and perhaps make the implied but unseen threats faced by my character seem that much more frightening. So again, my POV choice is designed to increase the narrative tension.
The challenges I’m encountering relate back to the benefits of multiple POV. From the standpoint of narrative, giving my readers necessary information is complicated by the fact that I’m writing from the viewpoint of only the one character. I don’t want him to know too much, because I need to preserve certain aspects of the mystery. And logistically I simply can’t have him everywhere my readers might need him to be. So I have to keep my readers in the dark about certain things. I have to balance the need to maintain the sense of mystery with my desire not to tick readers off by telling them too little.
From the standpoint of character development, the challenge is in making the characters around my protagonist come to life. I can’t be in their heads, so I have to rely upon my POV character to “tell” my readers about them through his observations and the interactions he has with them.
Clearly, these challenges can be overcome, and I think that what I’ve written thus far works quite well. But this is new for me, and I’m finding that I’m having to learn some of the basics of good storytelling all over again. That’s not a complaint; not at all. I think I decided to go with single character POV, in part, because after writing eleven books in multiple POV, I was looking for new challenges.
But I’d be interested in hearing from readers and writers alike. Which do you prefer: multiple character point of view or single character POV? Why? What do you get from one that you miss in the other?
David B. Coe http://davidbcoe.livejournal.com http://magicalwords.net http://www.davidbcoe.com